Legal Opinion
State v. Mukhtaar
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 26, 2017No. AC40099PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
The self-represented defendant, Abdul Mukhtaar, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claims that the trial court abused its discretion in (1) denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence and (2) denying his motion to allow an expert witness to testify. 1 We disagree.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. 2 On February 14, 1996, the defendant shot and killed Terri Horeglad, who was a passenger in a car that had stopped at the intersection of Fairfield and Iranistan Avenues in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Washington v. Michael Randall LauderdaleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State v. MukhtaarConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. TurnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022