Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1975No. 3221PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

A jury found Ernest Ambrose Thomas guilty of second degree murder. He now appeals and this court has jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court.

Thomas contends that the trial court committed fundamental error by failing to instruct the jury of the elements of voluntary manslaughter. As his defense, he had argued self-defense and lack of intent to commit murder.

Usually the failure of the trial court to give a jury an instruction which has not been requested is not error. State v. Evans, 109 Ariz. 491, 512 P.2d 1225 (1973). However, because of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. PoddarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. ClaytonArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. ChalmersArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. BrayArizona Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. WhittleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. State v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Arnold v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API