Legal Opinion

United States v. Schwartz

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 25, 1988No. Crim. A. 87-103 MMS, 87-105 MMS, 87-106 MMS, 88-7 MMS and 88-13 MMSPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Six defendants filed motions contesting the constitutionality of the Sentencing Guidelines (“the Guidelines”) issued by the United States Sentencing Commission (“the Commission”). All defendants were indicted for offenses committed after November 1, 1987, the effective date of the Guidelines. All have plead guilty or were found guilty after a jury trial. The Court has deferred the imposition of sentences until a date as soon as practicable after the issuance of this opinion and order on the constitutionality of the Guidelines.

Defendant Martin F. Schwartz…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. United States v. BogleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. RestrepoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. United States v. DahlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  5. United States v. Beverly BogleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API