Legal Opinion

People v. Achaibar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In order for a guilty plea to be entered knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily, a defendant must be advised of the direct consequences of the plea (People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 403 [1995]). Although there is no mandatory catechism, a minimum requirement for a valid plea is that the defendant understands the direct penal consequences (see People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242 [2005]).

*390Here, the plea minutes show only that prior to the allocution the prosecutor, defense attorney and court all agreed the disposition was an “open D,” that the prosecutor intended to make an unspecified recommendation at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. CatuNew York Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API