Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Kramarsky
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 11, 1981No. 19, Docket 80-7185PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
This is one of three unconsolidated cases argued together on appeal. Also argued were Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287 (2nd Cir.) (“Delta”), and Burroughs Corporation v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1308 (2nd Cir.). The plaintiff here is an employer which maintains employee benefit plans that are subject to federal regulation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (1976). Plaintiff is also subject to New York’s Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 296 (McKinney 1972 & Supp. 1980-81) (“HRL”). HRL requires that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. KramarskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Pervel Industries, Inc. v. State of Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
- Lumber, Production & Industrial Workers Local 2362 v. WondzellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota ex rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pervel Industrices Inc. v. State of Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. KramarskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. KramarskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1789, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,841 Delta Air Lines, Inc., Allegheny Airlines, Inc., National Airlines, Inc., Piedmont Aviation, Inc., Braniff Airways, Inc., North Central Airlines, Inc., Southern Airways, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Northwest Airlines, Inc., Trans World Airlines, Inc., Ozark Air Lines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., Pan American World Airways, Inc., and United Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Werner H. Kramarsky, Individually and in His Capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights Ann Thacher Anderson, Individually and in Her Capacity as General Counsel of the New York State Division of Human Rights the New York State Division of Human Rights, an Agency of the Executive Department of the State of New York Arthur Cooperman, Individually and in His Capacity as Chairman of the New York State Workmen's Compensation Board and the New York State Workmen's Compensation Board, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Dawson v. WhalandDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.