Summers v. State

Steele Hays, Justice.

In this appeal from a conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, appellant raises two points for reversal: the sufficiency of the evidence and whether the prosecuting attorney was acting without sufficient authorization. We find no merit in either argument.

Appellant, Charles Summers was charged with the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, marijuana, the alleged delivery occurring on March 10,1988. The case was heard by a jury on December 8,1988, which returned a verdict of guilty and sentenced appellant to four years. Appellant appeals from that…