Legal Opinion

People v. Singh

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1928No. Docket No. 1036PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant was convicted in the superior court in and for the county of Yuba of the infamous crime against nature (Pen. Code, see. 286), and he appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying him a new trial.

The alleged pederastic performance is alleged to have taken place in the city of Marysville, on or about the fourth day of February, 1928. The party upon whom the crime is alleged to have been committed was a boy approaching, if not just past, his majority.

It appears that two police officers while patrolling their “beats” in the neighborhood of Tenth and D Streets in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. People v. TerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. McElrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. State v. AlkhowarizmiArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API