Legal Opinion
Eichenwald v. Krigel's, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 13, 1995No. 94-2292-JWLPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
I. Introduction
A trial to the court was held from September 5, 1995 through September 8, 1995, in this sexual harassment action brought under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The plaintiffs, Helene Eichenwald (“Ms. Eichenwald”), Marla Rich-man (“Ms. Richman”), Leanne Fuller (formerly Alexander) (“Ms. Fuller”) and Thomas Harrison 1 (“Mr. Harrison”), claim that they were sübjected to an unlawful hostile work environment (and that Ms. Eichenwald was subjected to “quid pro quo” sexual harassment) which led to the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Laird v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Fortner v. State of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Helene Eichenwald v. Stephen Bradley SmallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Metzger v. City of LeawoodDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Walker v. Toolpushers Supply Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.