Legal Opinion
Dean v. City of Buffalo
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2008No. 6:02-cr-06029PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION & ORDER
MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Plaintiffs Andrew Dean (“Dean”) and Aaron Horowitz (“Horowitz”) initiated this action on January 16, 2002 against defendants WPH Midtown Associates, Hart Hotels, Inc., Shamrock Security, Inc., Earl Perrin, the City of Buffalo, the Buffalo Police Department and various officers of the Buffalo Police Department. (Docket ## 1, 33). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including the entry of final…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Young-Gibson v. PatelDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013
- Capak v. EppsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Graef v. Ricoh, USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Reinhardt v. The City of BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- XPO Enterprise Service Inc v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025