Legal Opinion

Centman v. Cobb

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1991No. 73A01-9109-CV-262PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Carl B. and Jane Centman (the Cent mans) appeal from a preliminary determination of law by which the trial court determined that Drs. Melinda A. Cobb and Kathryn A. Garner, who were recent graduates from medical school in postgraduate training and holders of temporary medical permits, should be "required to possess such skill and use such care as other capable medical college graduates serving in the first year of postgraduate medical training ordinarily possess and use under similar circumstances in the same or similar localities." On appeal, the Centmans claim the proper…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Jenkins v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. William Laurie Co. v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Watson v. Medical Emergency Services, Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arpin Ex Rel. Estate of Arpin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. St. Germain v. PfeiferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Arpin, Jeannine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Parraz v. The Board of Regents of the University of New MexicoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API