Legal Opinion

United States v. Manuel W. James, Etc. And Gustavo Fernandez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 30, 1982No. 82-5137PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

Manuel James and Gustavo Fernandez appeal from the district court’s amendment of their conditions for bond under 18 U.S.C. § 3146. Appellants contend that their bonds could not be altered absent proof that they had violated a bond condition, that the policy of the Northern District of Florida against property bonds violates § 3146, that the amended bonds denied them their eighth amendment rights not to be subjected to excessive bail, and that the trial court failed to give adequate reasons for the bond amendment. We reject these contentions and affirm.1

*888I. Background

Both…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Gerald Franklin Smith, United States of America v. Dale Ray HaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Harold WrightCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Carl David BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Cliffton Ralph CramerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Peter ZuccaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Fleet Wallace MaullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Marvin J. ZylstraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Maurice Walker v. City of Calhoun, GACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. John Richard McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Ex Parte Alfredo Castillo Lorente, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API