Legal Opinion

Lomax v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 7, 1984No. Record 831938PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

The sole question in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant the defendant’s motion for a continuance.

Clarence James Lomax was indicted for the murder of Muriel Johnson. A jury convicted him of the lesser-included offense of involuntary manslaughter and fixed his punishment at 10 years in the penitentiary. The court sentenced Lomax in accordance with the verdict.

On July 11, 1983, more than three weeks before trial, Lomax filed a discovery motion pursuant to Rule SATl.1 The defendant requested “[t]he results of any scientific tests, medical tests, autopsy reports,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cox v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Gilchrist v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Bobo v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Parish v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  2. Townes v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Cardwell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  4. Bennett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  5. Davis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API