Legal Opinion
Doe v. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 15, 1997No. 93-16792PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
131 F.3d 836
122 Ed. Law Rep. 973, 13 IER Cases 1809,
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9361,
97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,068
John DOE, Ph.D., and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY, John Nuckolls,
Director, and the Regents of the University of
California, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-16792.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Decided Dec. 15, 1997.
Richard Gayer, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Douglas H. Barton, Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus, Vlahos & Rudy, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees.
On Remand from the United States…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Salman v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2000
- Flint v. DennisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- New Star Lasers, Inc. v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1999
- Tony R. Mallery v. California Commission on Judicial PerformanceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026