Legal Opinion

Pendrak v. Keystone Shipping Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1982No. 1864PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

In this personal injury action we are required to interpret the meaning of the word “date” as set forth in Section 303(b) of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, *3951974, December 5, P.L. 782 No. 263, § 6, 77 P.S. § 481(b), (the Act). It provides:

In the event injury or death to an employee is caused by a third party, then such employee, his legal representative, husband or wife, parents, dependents, next of kin, and anyone otherwise entitled to receive damages by reason thereof, may bring their action at law against such third party, but the employer, his insurance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hefferin v. StempkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Anderson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Schoonover v. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. Lee v. United States Plywood Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maxim Crane Works, L.P. v. Tilbury ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Fulgham v. Daniel J. Keating Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
  3. McMaster v. Amquip Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API