Swen v. Swen

This appeal concerns a marriage of twenty-nine years. The parties had three children, all of whom have reached majority. We find no error in the trial court’s distribution of the parties’ assets. However, we conclude that the trial court should have awarded appellant permanent periodic alimony rather than rehabilitative alimony for a period of three years. Appellant did not work during most of the marriage. She *922had a college education and received a real estate license in 1980. However her annual net income has never exceeded $2,200. From this record we see no indication of a likelihood that…