Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Stephan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1993No. 93-3108PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Walter Johnson, an inmate at Lansing Correctional Facility, Lansing, Kansas, brought this action pro se alleging that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs in violation of his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Mr. Johnson further complains that prison officials denied television news personnel access to the prison to conduct a face-to-face interview with him in violation of the First, Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. After a Martinez report was ordered and received, the district court dismissed both claims as frivolous.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Saxbe v. Washington Post Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Willie Smart v. Romeo Villar, Chief Medical Officer, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Oklahoma Hospital Association v. Oklahoma Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gee v. PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Johnson v. StephanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Scott v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Conley v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Jones v. HanniganDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.