Churchill v. . Brooklyn Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
MotioN by the defendant for a certiorari as a substitute for an appeal, heard at February Term, 1885, of the Supreme Court. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
In this action the plaintiff, at Fall Term, 1882, of the Superior Court of Greene, recovered judgment against the defendant company by default, for want of an answer, for the full amount of his demand, which judgment was afterwards modified in form and made interlocutory, subject to an inquiry of damages before the jury, which ruling was affirmed on appeal to this court. Churchill v. Ins. Co., 88 N. C., 205.
At a subsequent term the damages were assessed, and from the judgment rendered therefor the defendant entered an appeal to this court, the amount of the undertaking was fixed at fifty…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Churchill v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Finlayson v. American Accident Co. of LouisvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Ice Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Griffin v. . NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Boyer v. GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.