Legal Opinion

Vincent v. Lessee of Huff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1818PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error. THIS was a writ of error to tbe Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming county, in an action of ejectment brought ky ^ lessee of Edmund Huff the defendant in error, against Peter Vincent, in February, 1799. A number of exceptions were taken, as well to the admission of testimony as to the charge of the Court; all of which are fully stated and ex- .. „ , plained in the opinion pt the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Gibs-on J.

Both parties claim under an application of the 3d April, 1769, in the name of John Palmer. On the 17th October, 1761, a survey was made by Charles Lukens, the deputy surveyor, in the name of John Palmer. The plaintiff 1 J 1 alleges the beneficial interest was m J.esse Lukens; and that he derives title from him. The defendant claims under John Lukens, the father of Jesse, then and until the time of his death the surveyor general of the land office, and who, the defendant says, was the owner of the location and survey, The survey, with certain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lessee of Cluggage v. SwainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1811
  2. Lessee of Bonnet v. DevebaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1810

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank of Utica v. MersereauNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  2. Brown v. DysingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
  3. Seitzinger v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  4. Brown v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  5. Vincent v. Lessee of HuffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1822

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API