Anonymous

Upon the trial plaintiff's counsel produced the indentures, and read them to the jury, whereby it appeared that the covenants were introduced in the former part of the instrument as between the chairman of the court, but not with his successors, of the one part, and the defendant of the other; and in a subsequent part the name of the apprentice was put for the name of the chairman, which rendered the whole writing insensible.

It was objected on the part of the defendant that this bond is not made pursuant to 1762, ch. 5, sec. 20, which directs it to be with the chairman and his successors, and…