Legal Opinion
In Re Woodman
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine
Decided January 17, 2003No. 13-20226PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JAMES B. HAINES, Jr., Chief Judge.
Before me are two Chapter 13 plans. As to each, no party contends that § 1325’s 1 confirmation requirements are unmet, with one exception. Evergreen Credit Union, an undersecured creditor in each ease, argues that the debtors have not satisfied § 1325(b)(l)(B)’s mandate that they devote all their projected “disposable income” to their plans for at least three years.
On the stipulated record, Evergreen asserts that the debtors’ monthly expenditures are excessive. More pointedly, it contends that the debtors’ acknowledged monthly purchases…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First USA v. LamannaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- In Re Luisa V. AnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Dressler v. Dressler (In Re Dressler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1996
- Harshbarger v. Pees (In re Harshbarger)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Sharlene De Ann TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re SlusherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
- In Re GuzmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
- Educational Credit Management Corp. v. Savage (In Re Savage)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2004
- In Re PierUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- In Re GlunkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.