Sappington v. Slade
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.
This case was decided shortly after it had been argued, and a per curiam order was then filed. We will now proceed to give our reasons in support of the conclusion then announced.
In eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, Governor Lowndes appointed William N. Mays, William W. Boyce and Charles A. Councilman, Supervisors of Election for Baltimore County. The term of office prescribed by the Act of i8g6, ch. 202, sec. 1, is two years. These appointees duly qualified and entered upon the discharge of their duties. In September, eighteen hundred and ninety-nine, Mr. Mays resigned, and á few days…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of County School Commissioners v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Ash v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Kroh v. SmootCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clark v. Harford Agricultural & Breeders' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Howard County Metropolitan Commission v. WestphalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Johnson v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Nesbitt v. FallonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Kleban v. Eghrari-SabetCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.