Webb v. Burney
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Madison. Tried below before the Hon. Norman G. Kittrell.
1Opinion of the Court
Collard, Judge.
The issue of fact as to whether the deed by Burney and wife to Cole Bros, was intended by the parties to be a mortgage, does not seem to have been decided by the trial judge. His finding of fact upon the question is as follows: “ 19. That the moving inducement to Burney was a fear of prosecution, and that he was not indebted or in default to such an amount as was claimed, and that when the deed was made the real, actual intention was that it should stand as a security for the debt, the consideration, the value of the property,- the demand for" security only, the unwillingness…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- L. M. Wiley & Co. v. PrinceTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Pierce v. FortTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Davis v. BrewsterTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Henderson v. TerryTexas Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by34 opinions
- Stewart v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Young v. BlainTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Essex v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Richmond v. Hog Creek Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Pickett v. Dallas Trust & Savings BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.