Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between L. A. Slesinger, Inc. & Calvine Mills, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.
These are cross motions, one to confirm an arbitrator’s award and the other to vacate, modify and correct the award. Respondent’s affidavits and exhibits, objections and arguments, present no sufficient legal ground to warrant vacatur of the award. Respondent does not establish any miscalculation of figures on the face of the award nor any other evidence that the award does not correctly reflect what the arbitrators intended. Respondent has not shown sufficient cause for its requested adjournment before the arbitrator and, more*557over, the facts indicate that the arbitrators’ decision to close…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Shirley Silk Co. & American Silk Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- In re the Arbitration of & Concerning Certain Matters in Difference between Pine Street Realty Co. & CoutroulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- In re the Arbitration between Brighton Mills, Inc. & Rayon Corp. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Matter of Pine Street Realty Company v. Nik CoutroulasNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- In re the Arbitration Between Friedheim & International Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Arbitration between L. A. Slesinger, Inc. & Calvine Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960