Legal Opinion

United States v. Hackman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2011No. 09-3948, 09-3949PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

Robert Hackman and Teddy Kiriakidis appeal from sentences arising out of a Missouri-based dog-fighting conspiracy. Each man pleaded guilty to conspiring to engage in animal fighting ventures in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and Hackman additionally pleaded guilty to engaging in animal fighting ventures in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 2156. When sentencing each defendant, the district court 1 applied an upward departure provision found in the application notes to United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG or Guidelines) § 2E3.1. Each appellant argues that his relevant conduct…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. Razo-GuerraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Lonnie Joseph Parker, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Shawn M. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Donna PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fast v. Applebee's International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. ORTEGA-LOPEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2013
  3. United States v. Leslie ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Sarah GodseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API