Legal Opinion

In re Crandall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 8, 1898No. 11144PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Original proceedings in habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

Warren Crandall, j$„, seeks release from imprisonment through the writ of habeas corpus. The history of the prosecution and the imprisonment is briefly as follows : On May 3, 1897, Lizzie Hinds *672filed a complaint before a justice of the peace charging that Crandall did feloniously use and cause and procure to be used, certain instruments, which were thrust in and upon the body and womb of Lizzie Hinds, a woman pregnant with a quick child, with intent to destroy such child. That the use of the instruments was not necessary to preserve the life of the mother, and was not advised by a physician…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. In re DonnellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. France v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Rouse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  4. Day v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Sanders v. McHanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API