Legal Opinion

Boeckmann v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1995No. 94-1024PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bradley D. Jesson, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Alfred W. Boeckmann, appeals from a decree of the Cross County Chancery Court, in which the chancellor declared that an equal partnership existed between the parties for the operation of a tire business, and appointed a receiver. His sole point on appeal is that the evidence presented below was insufficient to support the chancellor’s finding that a partnership existed. The Court of Appeals certified the case to this court pursuant to ARAP 2(a)(7), which allows for an appeal from “an interlocutory order appointing a receiver,” and Ark. Sup. Ct.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hercules Inc. v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Arnold & Arnold v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Sunbelt Exploration Co. v. Stephens Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Chapin v. StuckeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Arnold Fireworks Display, Inc. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southex Exhibitions, Inc. v. Rhode Island Builders Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Pledger v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Pearson v. First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Williams v. Brushy Island Public Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Slaton v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API