Legal Opinion

Little v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1970No. Civ. A. 69-910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.

The government has moved to reduce the ad damnum in this complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680, from the total amount of $11,000 claimed by the plaintiffs to $1391. Though this issue is not without difficulty, I find that the more persuasive authorities, when applied to the unique facts of the case, preclude the government from the relief requested.

On January 5, 1968, the wife-plaintiff slipped on a portion of the pavement surrounding the United States Post Office for Torresdale, Pennsylvania, and allegedly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rabovsky v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1967

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Judith Odin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. Locke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1972
  3. Heaton v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  4. Barbara Davis, Cross-Appellants. v. The Hon. John Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Apollo v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API