Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 9, 1982No. 62446Published

1Opinion of the Court

627 S.W.2d 298 (1982)

STATE of Missouri, Appellant,

v.

Irving E. THOMPSON, Respondent.

No. 62446.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

February 9, 1982.

John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., John C. Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for appellant.

James M. Martin, St. Louis, for respondent.

HIGGINS, Judge.

This appeal under Rule 30.02 and § 547.210, RSMo 1978, charges error to dismissal of the information as insufficient. Irving E. Thompson was charged by the State of Missouri with illegal possession of pentazocine,[1] a schedule IV controlled substance, in violation of § 195.240, RSMo 1978. The trial court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. State v. KrausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. Howell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API