Lagerev (Vladimir) v. State

from employing his own expert witness and he did not indicate any desire to do so. Therefore, we conclude Lagerev fails to demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion by allowing the State's expert rebuttal witness to testify. See Lopez v. State, 105 Nev. 68, 81,

769 P.2d 1276, 1285

(1989). Lagerev next contends that the district court erred by declining to allow him to call an untimely disclosed impeachment witness because impeachment witnesses need not be disclosed prior to trial and the witness' testimony directly supported his theory of defense. Lagerev informed the district…