Legal Opinion

Flint v. Dennison

District Court, D. Montana

Decided August 20, 2004No. CV 04-85-M-DWMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOLLOY, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Aaron Flint brings this action challenging campaign finance regulations imposed by the Associated Students of the University of Montana (“ASUM”). The ASUM bylaws restrict a senatorial candidate’s spending to $100.00 per election. Flint exceeded the spending limits result ing in an ASUM senate resolution preventing him from assuming the seat to which he was otherwise elected. Flint then filed this action against the president of the University, ASUM and its individual members (collectively referred to hereinafter as “ASUM”) contending that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Widmar v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hazelwood School District v. KuhlmeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Native Ecosystems Council v. MartenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API