Flint v. Dennison
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOLLOY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Aaron Flint brings this action challenging campaign finance regulations imposed by the Associated Students of the University of Montana (“ASUM”). The ASUM bylaws restrict a senatorial candidate’s spending to $100.00 per election. Flint exceeded the spending limits result ing in an ASUM senate resolution preventing him from assuming the seat to which he was otherwise elected. Flint then filed this action against the president of the University, ASUM and its individual members (collectively referred to hereinafter as “ASUM”) contending that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Widmar v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hazelwood School District v. KuhlmeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Native Ecosystems Council v. MartenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2018