Legal Opinion
Streifer v. Cabol Enterprises Ltd.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert D. Hamm, J.
Cabol Enterprises Limited, hereinafter called Cabol, has moved to set aside the service of a summons. The summons was served on its president within the State of New York. Cabol is a foreign corporation not qualified to do business in the State of New York..
The action arises out of an agreement by Cabol to' purchase from the more than 30 individual stockholders of Kingston Cable-*1050vision, Inc., of whom the plaintiffs are two, all their stock in Kingston Cablevision, Inc. Kingston Cablevision, Inc., is a New York corporation. When mentioned hereafter it will be referred to as Kingston…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Elish v. St. Louis Southwestern RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nordic Bank PLC v. Trend Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Mirabella v. Banco Industrial de la Republica ArgentinaNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Boryk v. Aerolineas ArgentinasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Bryant v. Finnish National AirlineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964