Legal Opinion
Karfunkel v. USLIFE Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Evans, J.
Motions Nos. 88, 90, 216 and 217 of April 12, 1982 are consolidated for disposition.
These two cases, which appeared on the same date on the Motion Calendar, involve the same matters, arose from the same transaction and involve, with few exceptions, the same parties. The motions are therefore consolidated for disposition.
The single derivative cause of action in the Karfunkel case alleges, in substance, that the individual defendants, some of whom are directors and some of whom are officers of USLIFE Corp. caused the corporation to purchase approximately 6%…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Independent Investor Protective League v. Time, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Tenney v. RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Richards v. Ernst Wiener Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Moses v. SouleNew York Supreme Court · 1909
- Melniker v. American Title & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Samuel M. Feinberg Testamentary Trust v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Snyder v. Pleasant Valley Finishing Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Bronzaft v. CaporaliNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Karfunkel v. USLife Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983