Legal Opinion
Fenster v. Makovsky
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 9, 1953PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
67 So.2d 427 (1953)
FENSTER et al.
v.
MAKOVSKY et ux.
Supreme Court of Florida, Division A.
October 9, 1953.
Theodore R. Nelson and David Drucker, Miami, for appellants.
Abbott, Burris & Langer, Miami, for appellees.
SEBRING, Justice.
The appellants, who were the plaintiffs below, instituted a suit against the appellees for the partition of a certain apartment house property in Dade County, alleging in their complaint that each of the parties were tenants in common and owned an undivided one-fourth interest therein. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it failed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. B. C. Lewis & SonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Hines v. SeibelsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Steinhardt v. Consolidated Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cruger v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Blankfeld v. Richmond Health Care, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Lapidus v. ARLEN BEACH CON. ASSOC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- POST TENSIONED ENG'G. CORP. v. Fairways Plaza Assoc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Arrieta v. Volkswagen Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.