Legal Opinion

Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. De Larrinaga

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1978No. 78-1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-shipper appeals the judgment for defendant-carrier in its suit for dam*101ages to a shipment of wire rods. Plaintiff asserts that the District Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are clearly erroneous — without adequate evidentiary support and “partially induced by an erroneous view of the law.” There is ample evidence in the record to support the lower court’s factual findings and legal conclusions. We affirm.

Plaintiff shipped a cargo of “open hearth wire rods” from Antwerp, Belgium to Jacksonville, Florida, aboard a vessel chartered by defendant. Two months after defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Emmco Insurance Company v. Wallenius Caribbean Line, S.A., Defendant-Third Party v. Gulfstream Shipping Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., in Personam, and Ss Marjorie Lykes, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., in RemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Otis McAllister Export Corp. v. Grancolombiana (New York), Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Associated Metals And Minerals Corporation v. M/V Rupert De LarrinagaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API