Legal Opinion

Centeno v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Dorfman & Associates and Supreme Furniture, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), dated June 15, 1992, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination denying their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion for summary judgment. Given…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Finegold v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Salisbury v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API