Claim of Zamora v. New York Neurologic Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentCardona, P.J.
Respectfully, we dissent. In our opinion, there is a distinction between those cases where a claimant has involuntarily retired and other cases where a claimant has involuntarily withdrawn from the labor market, but has not retired. That distinction centers on when the inference that the claimant’s subsequent loss of wages was attributable to his or her disability applies. It is important to note that, where, as here, “a claimant has a permanent partial disability but there has been no finding of involuntary retirement, the claimant has an obligation to demonstrate attachment to the labor…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Peck v. James Square Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Johnson v. Onondaga Heating & Air ConditioningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Stevenson v. Sunoco Flexible PackagingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007