Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 2012No. 2D07-200PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION WITH EXPLANATION

The Appellant, Bruce Cunningham, has filed a “motion for clarification” in this appellate proceeding. This proceeding was an appeal from the denial of a post-conviction motion. We affirmed the circuit court’s postconviction order in March 2008. We denied Mr. Cunningham’s request to recall mandate in June 2008. Our term of court for that period ended in July 2008. Accordingly, this court has no jurisdiction to consider this motion and we must strike this motion as unauthorized.

Although we strike this motion, the content of the motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norwood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Walton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Norwood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cedric Maurice Bucklon v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Devers-Division v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
  3. Holloman v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
  4. Ragan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API