Legal Opinion
United Dye Works, Inc. v. Scifo
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRubenstein, J.
The plaintiff, a former tenant of business property owned by the defendants, has brought this "action to recover damages pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (d) of section 8 of the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, § 8, as amd. by L. 1946, ch. 273) and now moves herein under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out affirmative matter contained in the answer and for judgment under rule 112.
Insofar as material to the present discussion the undisputed facts are as follows: On October 4, 1946, defendants, who are husband and wife, became the owners of store property. At that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Matter of FayNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Matthews v. MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of Sullivan Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Social Investigator Eligibles Ass'n v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crowley v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Schussel v. Jamaica Investors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Herrick v. IngrahamNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Mendelson v. HellerNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Pirone v. Zora Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.