Robert E. Wilson, III v. Daniel Valente Dantas
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentWilson, J.
We should dismiss this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction; the two issues as to which defendant sought leave to appeal have been rendered academic by plaintiffs subsequent amendment of his complaint. Defendants agree that those two issues are no longer present. However, because the majority has concluded otherwise, requiring us to reach the nonfinal arguments now raised by defendants, I address those arguments in detail. I disagree with the *1053majority’s conclusion as to the complaint’s sufficiency, and would remand the forum non conveniens issue for redetermi-nation.
I
Our rules require…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.