Legal Opinion

Miranda v. Clark, Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1950No. 12334_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action wherein appellant sought declaratory judgment against Tom C. Clark, Attorney General of the United States, Ugo Carusi, United States Commissioner of Immigration, and William I. Crane, Officer in charge of the Port of San Luis, Arizona. The judgment of the district court revoked a previous interim order of the court which had restrained the arrest and deportation of appellant, and declared that appellant was, by reason of forfeiture, no longer a citizen of the United States.

The case was disposed of below upon a formal statement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. ElgSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Dos Reis Ex Rel. Camara v. NicollsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
  3. Attorney General v. RickettsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. United States Ex Rel. Baglivo v. DayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  5. Yuichi Inouye v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hichino Uyeno v. AchesonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1951
  2. Mitsugi Nishikawa v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Gonzales v. LandonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  4. Nieto v. McGrathDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1951
  5. Bisceglia v. Acheson, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API