Legal Opinion

Benedict v. Beurmann

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Livingston. (Newton, J.) Bill to set aside an administratrixes sale, for partition, and an accounting of rents and profits. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

George E. Beurmann was at the time of his death, in 1874, the owner of a farm containing *398170 acres, worth between $5,000 and $6,000. He left surviving him the defendant Mary E. Beurmann, his widow, and five children, as follows: Henrietta, aged 22 years; George O., aged 19 years; Julia E., aged 14 years; Wert W., aged 12 years; and Mary E., aged 8 years. George O. died intestate in 1879, leaving a widow, but no issue. Julia E. married Fred O. Benedict, next friend herein, and died intestate in 1880, leaving as her only heir the complainant, Julia L. Benedict. Mary E. Beurmann was, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dwight v. BlackmarMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Zoellner v. ZoellnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lumley v. HaggertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Barris v. EmmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API