Legal Opinion

Erdmier v. Eunice

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1977No. 54073PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Eunice brought suit on a promissory note on which the appellants, Erdmier and three others, were co-makers. A verdict was returned to Eunice and the trial court entered judgment on the verdict and added interest to the amount awarded. The appellants contend the verdict was contrary to the evidence, that the court’s charge was erroneous, and that interest was illegally added to the verdict. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

Ray Thornton was proprietor of an enterprise known as the "Pearson Livestock Exchange.” He was unable to obtain, on his own financial merits, a required…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Jenkins v. Tastee-Freez of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. McCREACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. Ron Eason Enterprises, Inc. v. McColganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Dismuke v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Aston Mills, Inc. v. Suntek Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Dover v. Master Lease Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API