Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Hames

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action on Injunction Bond. Appeal from the City Court of Anniston. Tried before the Hon. B. F. Oassady.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

— The Anniston & Atlantic Railway Company having instituted proceedings to condemn a right of way over the lands of Cooper and others, and paid the assessed damages into court before final judgment of condemnation, proceeded to build its road on the proposed right of way. At this stagé Cooper et al. filed their bill in the Chancery Court of Calhoun county, praying an injunction restraining the rail*281way company from building its road • on the lands until the questions presented by the bill were determined. The writ issued as prayed, on a bond executed by the defendants te this action. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bolling v. TateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Rosser v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Curphy v. TerrellMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. Louis v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. West Blocton Sav. BankAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API