Legal Opinion

Edmond v. Phillips

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided September 28, 2012Published

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.

The plaintiff obtained a jury verdict in her favor in the amount of $5,000.00 in this motor vehicle tort action. The plaintiff had introduced, pursuant to G.L.c. 233, §79G, bills for medical expenses totaling $10,044.86, and after the verdict had moved for an additur or new trial pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 59. The defendant moved, also pursuant to Rule 59, for a “PIP offset,” that is, to have the amount of the verdict reduced by the $8,000.00 in personal injury protection (“PIP”) insurance benefits that had been paid to the plaintiff. Both motions were denied.

The defendant has appealed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mejia v. American Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  2. Morea v. Cosco, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Mester v. BarrettMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
  4. Mallegol v. DivinoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API