Legal Opinion

State v. Farrell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 19, 1976No. 57899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LeGRAND, Justice.

Defendant attacks his conviction for possession of a controlled substance (§ 204.-401(3), The Code) on the sole ground certain evidence used against him was obtained by search and seizure in violation of his constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and Article I, § 8 of the Constitution of the State of Iowa.

Defendant unsuccessfully sought to have this evidence suppressed by a timely pretrial motion. His later motion for directed verdict raised the same issue. It was also overruled. We affirm the judgment.

On the night of defendant’s arrest,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Gustafson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LampSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. State v. HilleshiemSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Bousman v. Iowa District Court for Clinton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. State v. HarveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. State v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API