Legal Opinion
Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Holmes
District Court, D. Montana
Decided March 16, 1940No. 1550PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This action in equity is brought for the purpose of testing the constitutionality of Chapter 95 of the Laws passed by the Twenty-fifth Legislative Assembly, in regular session, of the State of Montana, as interpreted by the Attorney General of that state, and as so interpreted threatened to be enforced against the complainant herein by the defendant as State Auditor and Ex Officio Insurance Commissioner of'the State of Montana.
In its Bill of Complaint complainant prays:
1: That the aforesaid Chapter 95 of the Laws of Montana, 1937, insofar as it requires that an agent of this complainant…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kennton, Etc. v. Goodpaster, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Kenton & Campbell Benev. Burial Ass'n v. GoodpasterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1946
- Ware v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945