Legal Opinion
Brayman v. Stevens
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1967PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph F. Hawkins, J.
The respondents, the Commissioners of Election of the Board of Elections, Dutchess County, and the County of Dutchess, move to dismiss the proceeding at bar on the grounds that the court lacks jurisdiction both in personam *975and in rem. Were it not for the inexorable timetable — Election Day occurring only two weeks hence — we should embark on a comprehensive review and critique of both the remedy invoked by petitioner and the motion by respondents. It suffices, under the circumstances, to note merely that the respondents in support of their motion to dismiss urge, inter alia, that the court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of N.Y. Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Matter of LindgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Shilbury v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- In re RyanNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Wholesale Laundry Board of Trade, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Goldstein v. CarlsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Ferraro v. City School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Mazur v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Lucariello v. Commissioners of Chautauqua County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Jones v. GalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.