Collins v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1ConcurrenceNye, Chief Justice
I concur in the opinion of this Court because the rule is now well established in Texas that a conviction cannot stand where jury discussion of parole denies the accused a fair and impartial trial.
The appellate courts of this State have failed, however, to apply a consistent standard in determining how extensive the jury’s discussion must be, or what impact the discussion must have, before a defendant is denied a fair and impartial trial. Munroe v. State, 637 S.W.2d 475 (Tex.Cr.App.1982). In seeking to clarify the conflicting standards, the Court of Criminal Appeals in Munroe held that a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Munroe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Feggins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.