Dalton v. Stout
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentWolfe, Justice
I dissent. I think we should decide this case on the merits. We have the specification of the errors in the abstract. Respondent was apprised of what rulings of the lower court the appellants were attacking. He not only made no objection to the failure to file an assignment of errors, but wrote his brief and argument in apparent ignorance that the paper known as the assignment of errors had not been filed. Only the latter paper was lacking from the files. The prevailing opinion quotes from Teakle v. San Pedro, etc., R. Co., 32 Utah 276, at page 280, 90 P. 402, 405, 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 486,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Teakle v. San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. StenbackUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- Perrin v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- Lyon v. MaussUtah Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.