Krohn v. Foster

Appellant seeks review of an order modifying his visitation rights with his minor daughter. He argues that the order con-*1131statutes a denial of due process of law because visitation was neither raised as an issue by the pleadings nor tried by consent, and that the order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that it contains no evidence sufficient to establish either a substantial or material change in circumstances since the entry of the final judgment which initially established Appellant’s visitation rights, or that changing…